LLMrefs pricing is one All-in-One plan at $79 per month, marked limited-time, with 500 tracked prompts and unlimited domains and team seats, per the October 2026 listing. Reviews conflict on whether it includes eight or ten AI engines, and no annual price is listed. Most trackers end at mention counts, while Sona AI Visibility links AI citations and prompts to pipeline and revenue. Verify the price and engine list in the live dashboard before budgeting.
How much does LLMrefs cost per month?
LLMrefs has one paid option rather than multiple tiers: the All in One plan is listed at $79 per month with a 500-prompt allowance refreshed weekly. The October 2026 listing labels the $79 price as limited time only.
A year of LLMrefs access costs $948 if the monthly price remains unchanged and no annual discount applies, based on the August 2026 pricing review. No public annual discount appeared in the October 2026 pricing record.
LLMrefs also offers a free plan, although the durable listing does not define its limits. The paid plan includes a 7-day free trial, and a September 2026 review reports that the trial does not require a credit card.
With no published paid tiers to compare, the central question is whether 500 weekly refreshed prompts cover the brands, competitors, sources, and fan-out queries a team needs to monitor.
What is included in the $79 LLMrefs plan?
The $79 LLMrefs All in One plan includes 500 tracked prompts for brand mentions, cited sources, and fan-out queries, according to the October 2026 listing. A September 2026 review also reports unlimited domains, projects, and team members.
The plan supports AI competitor analysis and AI search visibility tracking across multiple answer engines. Its published structure separates usage capacity, the shared 500-prompt budget, from organisational capacity, where domains, projects, and seats are reported as unlimited.
| Plan element | Published inclusion | Why it affects evaluation | Evidence date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paid plan | One All in One plan at $79/month | There is no published paid tier ladder | October 2026 listing |
| Prompt allowance | 500 prompts | Shared across mention, source, and fan-out monitoring | October 2026 listing |
| Workspace scope | Unlimited domains, projects, and team members | Supports multiple brands or client workspaces | September 2026 review |
| Trial | 7 days, reportedly without a credit card | Allows a prompt-budget test before purchase | August and September 2026 reviews |
A brand-level visibility number provides orientation, but it does not identify the work required. Prompt-level reporting shows which prompts and cited sources drive that number. Sona AI Visibility connects citations to pipeline and revenue, while its prompt-level data identifies the questions and pages behind AI search performance.
Does LLMrefs track eight AI engines or ten?
LLMrefs has conflicting published engine counts: a September 2026 review lists eight AI engines, while an August 2026 review reports ten. The eight-engine list names ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and Meta AI.
The discrepancy does not prove either count is wrong. Engine inventories can change, and reviews may count answer surfaces, model variants, or active integrations differently. Buyers should confirm the active engine list in the live trial dashboard before using eight or ten as a procurement requirement.
For context, Sona's own AI visibility data covers 8 answer surfaces: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Mistral, Qwen, and Claude, per Sona's own AI visibility data, September 2026. Coverage counts become comparable only when the named surfaces match.
Prepare a fixed prompt list and verify that each required answer engine returns results for the same tracked prompts. This test shows whether a listed engine is included in the plan, actively refreshed, and relevant to the buyer journey under review.
What does the 500-prompt limit mean in practice?
The 500-prompt LLMrefs limit is a shared monitoring budget, not 500 isolated keywords for every domain. The October 2026 listing says the allowance covers brand mentions, cited sources, and fan-out queries, while the pricing record says those prompts refresh weekly.
A September 2026 review reports unlimited domains and projects, but those workspaces draw from the same published prompt capacity. An agency can add clients without adding seats, yet must allocate monitoring coverage across each client portfolio.
- Reserve prompts for core commercial queries and competitor comparisons.
- Assign a defined portion to cited-source monitoring.
- Use fan-out queries where a buyer phrase has meaningful variations.
- Keep unused capacity for new launches, category shifts, or competitor moves.
Repeated measurements help distinguish persistent movement from short-lived variation. Answers can shift with retrieval indexes, model updates, and new competitor content, so weekly monitoring should be evaluated against the operating rhythm that informs decisions.
LLMrefs publishes weekly refreshes for its 500 prompts, so evaluate the allowance as weekly monitoring capacity. The number of prompts needed for a keyword depends on the number of query variations required for that topic, brand, source, or buyer journey.
How does LLMrefs pricing compare with other AI visibility trackers?
LLMrefs costs $79 per month for 500 prompts refreshed weekly, while other trackers publish daily prompt allowances and different engine coverage. The comparison below normalises published starting prices and daily prompt figures where each provider supplies enough information, as of October 2026.
Weekly refresh means LLMrefs has no comparable cost per daily tracked prompt. The table preserves its published cadence rather than inventing a daily unit. Sona AI Visibility appears first because it connects AI citations and prompts to pipeline and revenue on one account timeline.
| Tool | Starting price | Agency Plans? | # of Answer Engines Tracked | Answer Engines | # of Daily Tracked Prompts (entry plan) | Cost per Daily Tracked Prompt | Differentiation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sona AI Visibility | From $75/month, billed annually | Yes | 11 | ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Claude, DeepSeek, Grok, Copilot, Qwen, Mistral | 5,000 credits/month, about 166 daily tracked prompts on one model or 56 across three | $0.45 per daily tracked prompt | Connects AI citations and prompts to pipeline and revenue on one account timeline |
| LLMrefs | From $79/month | No | 8 | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, Meta AI | 500 prompts, refreshed weekly | Weekly refresh, daily unit unavailable | AI competitor analysis and AI search visibility tracking |
| Peec AI | From $95/month | Yes | 3 | ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, Google AI Overviews | 50 prompts daily | $0.63 per daily tracked prompt | AI visibility monitoring across self-serve and agency plans |
| Otterly.ai | From $29/month | Yes | 4 | ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity, Microsoft Copilot | 15 prompts daily | $0.48 per daily tracked prompt | Prompt monitoring with engine add-ons available |
| PromptWatch | From $95/month | Yes | Not published | Not published | 50 prompts daily | $0.48 per daily tracked prompt | Prompt and response-volume monitoring |
| Goodie | From $295/month | Yes | 5 | Not published | 110 prompts daily | $0.67 per daily tracked prompt | Multi-model AI visibility tracking |
Published price alone does not determine fit. LLMrefs suits teams that want one plan and weekly coverage, while Sona AI Visibility is relevant when measurement must extend from answers and citations to accounts, pipeline, and revenue.
Will the LLMrefs price stay at $79, and is annual billing available?
The $79 LLMrefs monthly price should not be treated as permanent because the October 2026 listing labels it limited time only. No public annual billing discount was listed, so no verified discounted annual rate is available for budgeting.
At the current monthly price, twelve months total $948, based on the August 2026 pricing review. That figure is a planning baseline, not a contractual annual commitment. Procurement teams should request written confirmation of the renewal price, billing interval, trial conversion terms, and any usage overage policy.
LLMrefs has one published paid tier, so a price change carries more weight than it would in a multi-tier catalogue. A higher future price cannot be offset by moving to a smaller paid plan, based on the October 2026 plan listing.
Teams that need attribution beyond visibility should assess that commercial question separately. Sona AI Visibility includes AI Attribution, which connects AI citations to accounts, pipeline, and closed-won revenue on one account timeline.
How were these LLMrefs prices checked, and what was left unverified?
LLMrefs pricing in this article was checked against the October 3, 2026 plan listing and cross-checked against reviews dated August and September 2026. The review confirms a $79 monthly plan, with unresolved questions around annual billing and the current engine count.
No hands-on LLMrefs account test, dashboard capture, or engine-by-engine validation was available for this review. The article therefore does not claim observed results for prompt reporting, citations, fan-out queries, active engine selection, or refresh completion.
A reproducible buyer test should use a fixed set of category prompts, competitor comparisons, source-led questions, and fan-out variations during the 7-day trial. Record the active engine selection, whether each prompt returns a mention or citation, the cited source shown for each answer, and any fan-out query output. Repeat the same prompt set after the published weekly refresh, then compare results against the original record. This process validates observed dashboard behaviour, rather than listing-derived claims.
The method separates direct plan details from independently reported details. Where records disagree, the article preserves the disagreement rather than selecting the more favourable number. That distinction matters for engine coverage, where both eight and ten have been reported.
| Item checked | Finding | Evidence used | Verification status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly paid price | $79 for All in One, marked limited time only | October 3, 2026 listing | Published |
| Prompt allowance | 500 prompts for mentions, sources, and fan-out queries | October 3, 2026 listing | Published |
| Refresh cadence | Weekly | October 2026 pricing record | Published |
| Engine count | Eight reported in September, ten reported in August | August and September 2026 reviews | Unresolved |
| Annual discount | No public annual discount found | August and October 2026 records | Unverified |
wordsatscale.com describes LLMrefs pricing as free of hidden fees and complex add-ons, but that assessment is not a published pricing term. Treat it as a signal, then confirm renewal, usage, and service terms in writing before approving a subscription.
When does the price gap between trackers stop mattering?
The price gap between AI visibility trackers stops mattering when the cost of an unmeasured decision exceeds the subscription difference. That threshold appears when a team must connect AI-referred visits and citations to qualified accounts, pipeline, or closed-won revenue rather than count appearances.
A $79 monthly plan is sufficient for a contained prompt portfolio, weekly visibility, and decisions based on mention, citation-source, and fan-out data. Reported unlimited domains and seats also reduce administrative friction across multiple brands.
The gap matters less when prompt capacity is the true constraint. A 500-prompt allowance must cover every monitored brand, category, competitor, source, and query variation. Adding domains without expanding prompt capacity increases portfolio breadth, not monitoring depth.
Sona Marketing Measurement treats AI search as a measurable channel with spend, deals, and ROAS alongside other channels. That distinction matters when marketing leadership needs a revenue answer rather than a visibility report.
Who should buy LLMrefs at this price, and who should look elsewhere?
LLMrefs suits teams that want one $79 monthly plan, 500 prompts refreshed weekly, and reported unlimited domains, projects, and team members. It fits AI visibility monitoring where weekly results match the operating rhythm.
LLMrefs also suits agencies that need to organise multiple client domains without published per-seat charges. The shared 500-prompt budget remains the capacity limit because every additional client draws from the same monitoring pool.
Teams should look elsewhere when they require daily prompt resolution, a verified engine list before purchase, a larger published prompt allocation, or measurement that connects AI search activity to revenue. Sona AI Visibility tracks AI crawler activity from server logs and connects citations to pipeline and revenue, which supports that broader measurement requirement.
Use the 7-day trial to test a representative prompt portfolio. Include category prompts, competitor comparisons, source-led questions, and fan-out variations. Confirm the answer engines that matter to the business, then measure how much of the 500-prompt budget remains for ongoing monitoring.
What are the frequently asked questions about LLMrefs pricing?
How much does LLMrefs cost?
LLMrefs has one paid All in One plan at $79 per month, per the October 2026 listing. The price is labelled limited time only. At $79 monthly, the annualised cost is $948 with no published annual discount, based on the August 2026 pricing review.
How many prompts does LLMrefs include?
LLMrefs includes 500 tracked prompts covering brand mentions, cited sources, and fan-out queries, per the October 2026 listing. As of October 2026, the 500 prompts were listed as refreshed weekly. The number of prompts required for a keyword depends on the query variations used for that topic.
Which AI engines does LLMrefs track?
A September 2026 review lists eight engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude, Copilot, and Meta AI. An August 2026 review reports ten engines. Confirm the active engine list in the live dashboard before making an engine-coverage decision.
Does LLMrefs offer annual billing?
No public annual pricing was found in the August and October 2026 pricing records. A yearly discount therefore cannot be calculated from published information. Ask for written annual billing, renewal, and cancellation terms before approving a yearly commitment.
Are there hidden fees or add-ons with LLMrefs?
wordsatscale.com describes LLMrefs pricing as free of hidden fees and complex add-ons. The paid plan reportedly includes unlimited domains, projects, and team members. Confirm all contractual charges, overages, and renewal terms directly before purchase.
Is LLMrefs suitable for agencies?
The reported unlimited domains, projects, and team seats support multi-client work. The shared 500-prompt budget remains the limit to size against client count because brand, source, and fan-out monitoring all use the same published allowance.
Summarize this article with AI: ChatGPT · Claude · Perplexity · Google AI Mode
Last updated: October 2026
